KFUM ضد Molde — Eliteserien

**KFUM 2-4 Molde**

**What set this match apart:** This match was more unusual than 57% of matches. The primary source of this atypicality was found in the attacking phase (38% of the unusualness) and the build-up (33% of the unusualness). Molde was significantly more effective in creating clear-cut scoring opportunities, recording 8 big chances to KFUM's 0, a gap at the 99th percentile of gaps. Furthermore, Molde found much more space in dangerous areas, recording 15 shots inside the box compared to just 4 for KFUM, a gap at the 98th percentile of gaps.

**How it played out:** Molde maintained a much higher volume of activity in the final third, recording 9 shots on target to KFUM's 4, a gap at the 93rd percentile of gaps. This pressure was sustained throughout the game, as evidenced by Molde recording 9 corners to KFUM's 3, a gap at the 93rd percentile of gaps. While both teams were active in the opponent's half with 364 passes between them (72nd percentile of joint volume), Molde was clearly ahead with 252 to KFUM's 112, a gap at the 92nd percentile of gaps. In terms of direct play, few accurate long balls were recorded in the match (12th percentile of joint volume), but Molde was clearly ahead with 28 to KFUM's 15, a gap at the 89th percentile of gaps. Defensively, few interceptions were recorded in the match (19th percentile of joint volume), but Molde was clearly ahead with 13 to KFUM's 4, a gap at the 94th percentile of gaps. KFUM focused on winning the ball back by challenging, recording 21 tackles to Molde's 16, a gap at the 82nd percentile of gaps, while Molde won more aerial duels, 21 to KFUM's 12, a gap at the 92nd percentile of gaps.

**Verdict:** The fair probabilities are KFUM win 13%, draw 24%, and Molde win 63%. The performances pointed to a Molde win and that is what happened. This was supported by the fact that Molde created 8 big chances while KFUM created 0.