Dundee FC contre Motherwell — Scottish Premiership

**Dundee FC 2-1 Motherwell**

**Playing Style:** Dundee FC played a more defensive and counter-attacking style, evidenced by their higher number of defensive actions (96 vs 34), higher defensive actions share (74 vs 26), and greater success in duels (66 vs 46). They also had more successful tackles (29 vs 15), blocks (6 vs 0), and clearances (50 vs 13), indicating a strong defensive structure. Motherwell, on the other hand, dominated possession (67% vs 33%), made more passes (613 vs 294), and had a higher pass accuracy (87% vs 77%). They also had more successful dribbles (9 vs 4) and were more effective in pressing, as shown by their higher number of interceptions (6 vs 11) and higher dominance efficiency (65 vs 33).

**Strengths and Weaknesses:** Dundee FC's strengths lay in their defensive resilience, with strong performances in duels, aerial challenges, and clearances. They also had a higher conversion rate on big chances (67% vs 0%), which was crucial in securing the win. However, they struggled with shot creation, having fewer shots on target (2 vs 9) and fewer shots inside the box (7 vs 9). Motherwell's strengths were their possession-based play, with high pass volume and accuracy, and a strong presence in the opponent’s half (69 vs 27). They also had more shots (21 vs 9) and shots on target (9 vs 2). However, their inability to convert big chances (0% vs 67%) was a major weakness, and they conceded more shots inside the box (43 vs 78).

**Conclusion:** Despite Motherwell’s dominance in possession and shot volume, Dundee FC secured the win through better efficiency in converting big chances (67% vs 0%). Motherwell created more dangerous opportunities, as shown by their higher shots on target (9 vs 2) and higher shot on target share (82 vs 18), but failed to capitalize. Dundee FC’s strong defensive performance, particularly in duels and clearances, limited Motherwell’s effectiveness. The final score (2-1) reflects Dundee FC’s clinical finishing on limited chances and Motherwell’s inability to convert their numerical advantage into goals.