Gillingham contra Bromley — League Two

**Gillingham 1-4 Bromley**

**Playing Style:** Gillingham dominated possession and created numerous chances, with 19 total shots (11 on target) and 67% ball possession. Their approach was forward-oriented, with more passes in the opponent’s half (166 vs 60) and a high presence in the opponent’s half (81% vs 32%). They were also more effective in aerial duels (56% vs 44%) and ground duels (61% vs 39%). Bromley, in contrast, played a more compact and defensive style, with fewer shots (13 total, 6 on target) and less possession (33%). However, they were more efficient in converting their limited chances, with 100% conversion rate on big chances compared to Gillingham’s 25%.

**Strengths and Weaknesses:** Gillingham’s strengths included high volume of possession, accurate passing (67% vs 43%), and strong dueling (68 vs 50). They also had more touches inside the opponent’s box (28 vs 11) and were more effective in progressing from the opponent half into the box (17% vs 18%). However, their weakness was poor finishing, with only 25% conversion rate on big chances and a lower box entry to shot rate (68 vs 118). Bromley’s strengths were their efficiency in converting chances, strong defensive actions (100 vs 45), and better goalkeeping (10 saves vs 2). They also had more clearances (71 vs 30) and interceptions (19 vs 7). Their weakness was limited shot creation, with fewer shots on target (6 vs 11) and less control in the opponent’s half (32% vs 81%).

**Conclusion:** Despite Gillingham’s dominance in possession, passing, and dueling, Bromley’s clinical finishing on their limited chances led to the 1-4 result. Gillingham created more and better opportunities, as evidenced by their higher shot on target percentage (58 vs 46) and more shots inside the box (63% vs 46%). However, they struggled to convert these into goals, with only 25% conversion rate on big chances. Bromley, on the other hand, capitalized fully on their one big chance, scoring with 100% efficiency. This highlights Gillingham’s need to improve their finishing, while Bromley’s ability to defend and counter-attack effectively was crucial in securing the win.